Hi guys, Welcome to the Advanced Video Search Engine, and you are watching 2019 Suzuki Jimny vs Dacia Duster Crash Test. That video is uploaded by the Mirror at 2019-02-26T07:58:45-08:00. We are promoting this video only for entertainment and educational purpose only. So, I hope you like & enjoy it. [-7-fnGhkjxo]
| Name | 2019 Suzuki Jimny vs Dacia Duster Crash Test |
| Video Uploader | Video From the Mirror |
| Upload Date | This Video Uploaded At 26-02-2019 15:58:45 |
| Video Discription | Suzuki Jimny vs Dacia Duster - Suzuki Jimny: In the frontal offset test, there was insufficient pressure in the driver's airbag to prevent it from 'bottoming out', allowing the head to contact the steering wheel. The score for the head was penalised for the behaviour of the airbag and the displacement of the steering wheel, and protection for this part of the body was rated as marginal. #suziki jimny #dacia duster #duster #jimny The passenger compartment was extensively deformed in the offset test, especially around the door-frame and the score for the driver's chest was penalised for this unstable collapse. Combined with marginal dummy readings, protection for this body area was rated as weak. Although dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both driver and passenger, structures in the instrument panel and dashboard were thought to pose a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes, and protection was rated as marginal. In the full-width, rigid-barrier impact protection of the head of the rear passenger dummy was rated as weak, based on dummy readings during the test and protection of the chest of both driver and rear passenger was marginal. Tests on the front seats and head restraints showed marginal protection against whiplash injury in a rear impact. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated good protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries are caused. However, the Jimny did not qualify for these points as Euro NCAP requires good head restraint performance as a pre-requisite for AEB points. In the frontal offset test, protection of all critical body areas was good except for the necks of both dummies, protection of which was rated as adequate. In the side barrier test, protection of both dummies was good for all critical parts of the body. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the Jimny is designed could be properly installed and accommodated. Dacia duster The passenger compartment of the Duster remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger but structures in the dashboard on the driver's side were thought to present a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, head injury values based on decelerations indicated poor protection for this part of the body and all points for the driver dummy were lost. Dummy readings for the head of the rear passenger were good, but it moved too far forward in the test, and protection was rated as marginal. In the side barrier test, the Duster provided good protection to all critical body areas and scored maximum points. Even in the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body areas was good. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated marginal protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated marginal whiplash protection. In the frontal offset test, dummy readings in the 6 year dummy indicated marginal chest protection but, otherwise, protection was good or adequate for both dummies. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical parts of the body was good for both child dummies. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. The marking of ISOFIX/i-Size anchorages in the rear outboard seats did not meet Euro NCAP's requirements so the installation check of all such restraints is indicated as a partial fail, although the restraints could be installed and accommodated in the car. Universal restraints are not allowed in the front passenger seat so the installation checks are deemed to have failed. -7-fnGhkjxo |
| Category | Autos & Vehicles |
| Tags | 25.02.2019 |
