Hi guys, Welcome to the Advanced Video Search Engine, and you are watching United States v. Patane Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained. That video is uploaded by Quimbee at 2020-10-29T11:29:35-07:00. We are promoting this video only for entertainment and educational purpose only. So, I hope you like & enjoy it. [Vslt34N4h5M]
| Name | United States v. Patane Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained |
| Video Uploader | Video From Quimbee |
| Upload Date | This Video Uploaded At 29-10-2020 18:29:35 |
| Video Discription | Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview United States v. Patane | 542 U.S. 630 (2004) It’s widely known that a defendant’s confession is inadmissible at trial if a police officer failed to warn the defendant about his Miranda rights before interrogating him. But what about physical evidence that an officer discovers as the result of the defendant’s confession? Will it be suppressed, too? The United States Supreme Court addressed this issue in United States versus Patane. Officers arrested Samuel Patane, who had a felony record, for violating a restraining order. When officers started reading Miranda warnings to Patane, he interrupted the officers and said that he knew his rights. The officers, without reading the remainder of the required Miranda warnings, asked Patane if he possessed a firearm. Patane admitted that he had a pistol in his bedroom, which the officers seized. A federal grand jury charged Patane with being a felon in possession of a firearm. The prosecution stated that it wouldn’t introduce Patane’s confession to possessing the pistol because the interrogating officers failed to comply with Miranda. However, Patane moved to suppress the pistol itself under Miranda. The district court didn’t rule on Patane’s Miranda motion because the court suppressed the pistol on an alternative Fourth Amendment basis. On the government’s appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit disagreed with the district court’s Fourth Amendment ruling. The circuit court nevertheless sustained the district court’s suppression of the pistol based on the officers’ failure to read complete Miranda warnings to Patane. The government successfully petitioned the United States Supreme Court to review Patane’s case. Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/united-states-v-patane The Quimbee App features over 16,300 case briefs keyed to 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/united-states-v-patane Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=QuimbeeDotCom Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/quimbeedotcom/ Twitter ► https://twitter.com/quimbeedotcom #casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries Vslt34N4h5M |
| Category | Education |
| Tags | U.S. v. Patane | briefs | quimbee | law case | case brief example | brief case | case brief | press brief | case summaries | legal brief | how to brief a case | case brief template | legal brief case | how to write a case brief | legal brief example | sample case brief | case brief format | example of a brief | law briefs | legal brief definition | what is a brief in law | what is a case brief | court brief | brief definition law | legal brief template | facts of the case | case summary example |
