Hi guys, Welcome to the Advanced Video Search Engine, and you are watching ట్రిప్ పూర్తి చేయని ఉబర్ డ్రైవర్ పై 15 వేల జరిమానా Uber driver refuses to complete trip, 15k penalty. That video is uploaded by Prof K Nageshwar at 2024-07-10T18:00:12-07:00. We are promoting this video only for entertainment and educational purpose only. So, I hope you like & enjoy it. [L3TqFD92pyw]
| Name | ట్రిప్ పూర్తి చేయని ఉబర్ డ్రైవర్ పై 15 వేల జరిమానా Uber driver refuses to complete trip, 15k penalty |
| Video Uploader | Video From Prof K Nageshwar |
| Upload Date | This Video Uploaded At 11-07-2024 01:00:12 |
| Video Discription | #profknageshwar #ProfkNageshwaranalysis #mlcnageshwar #consumerprotectionact #consumerprotectionact2019 #consumerprotection #consumerprotectionact1986 #consumerprotectionclass12 #supremecourt #lawyers #apexcourt Consumer court imposes penalty on Uber after driver refuses to complete trip A coram of Presiding Member HPS Mahal and member Kiran Sibal noted that in an employer-employee relationship, the employer is liable for third-party acts. The Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission recently upheld a penalty of ₹15,000 imposed on Uber India for mental agony and harassment after an Uber driver forced a passenger to vacate without completing the trip. [Uber India Systems Pvt. Ltd v Mohit Bansal and Anr.] A coram of Presiding Member HPS Mahal and member Kiran Sibal noted that in an employer-employee relationship, the employer is liable for third-party acts. "It is established that the Uber App is managed and controlled by the appellant/OP No.2 and also all transactions and services provided via said App is managed by the appellant. It is a settled principle of law that in an employer-employee relationship, the employer is liable for the acts of the third party and is also responsible to provide the social security benefits," the order dated June 4 stated. The case originated from a complaint filed by a consumer who had booked an Uber-X cab from Zirakpur to Kalka on March 7, 2017. The customer alleged that the driver misbehaved and forced him to vacate the cab after traveling a short distance. The driver also demanded a fare of ₹105 for the incomplete trip. https://www.barandbench.com/news/consumer-court-imposes-penalty-uber-driver-refuses-complete-trip L3TqFD92pyw |
| Category | News & Politics |
| Tags | prof k nageshwar rao | prof k nageshwar | prof k nageshwar analysis | prof k nageshwar latest | mlc nageshwar | mlc nageshwar rao | prof nageshwar | #consumerprotectionact | #consumerprotectionact2019 | #consumerprotection | #consumerprotectionact1986 | #consumerprotectionclass12 | National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) | consumer forum. | apex court | Lawyers |
